Radiology-group Financial Performance

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon
Google icon

Provided by Regents Health Resources

Image Market File  Image Market File

Regents Health Resources was formed in 1996 to assist hospitals and physicians in the development and management of their medical-imaging and oncology services. The consultancy has served more than 500 clients nationwide with a diverse range of services, from strategic planning and operational assessments to joint-venture planning, valuations, and imaging-center sales and acquisitions.


Reimbursement pressure, the rising cost of infrastructure, and trends in payor mix are putting continued downward pressure on radiologist compensation. Introduction: This third installment of the Imaging Market File tracks four key financial-performance measures over time: payor mix, receipts per unit of service, administrative-infrastructure expense, and total physician compensation (Figures 1–4). The dataset includes professional-component services only, billed by 112 hospital-based radiology groups ranging in size from eight members to 94 members; the groups are located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southwest, and Northwest regions. The 2008, 2009, and 2010 datasets are actual performance numbers; the 2011 numbers represent actual data through June 2011. Multiple sources contributed to the dataset: Integrated Medical Partners, Dominion Medical Management, and Barrington Lakes Group (all of Milwaukee, Wisconsin) and Regents Health Resources and National Imaging Network (both of Brentwood, Tennessee). In the table at right, which illustrates the varying levels of CMS reimbursement seen throughout the United States, Puerto Rico serves as the baseline. For every $100 collected in Puerto Rico, this table indicates the amounts that would be collected in other locations (source: Integrated Medical Partners).
Figure 1. Medicare/Medicaid/self-pay trends, tracked over time, show that government and patients are responsible for an increasing percentage of healthcare costs, while the share borne by all other payors (including private payors and business) is on the decline. Factors fueling the increase in total share are the aging of the population, higher deductibles, and high unemployment.
Figure 2. Payment per unit of service has decreased due to a number of factors (including regulatory changes and shifts in modality mix and payor mix), forming a trend that is likely to continue. Direct hits to the professional component have been proposed through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2012.
Figure 3. Administrative-infrastructure costs, as a percentage of net revenue, have increased steadily, over the past four years, as net receipts have declined. Personnel salaries, benefits, and technology are among the factors driving up administrative expenses, which also include postage and supplies.
Figure 4. Total physician compensation, as a percentage of receipts, has eroded in direct proportion to decreases in reimbursement and increases in administrative support infrastructure; these converge to create their impact on available revenue and distributions to partners.


Read or download the other Imaging Market Files. Accomodating Imaging Volume Under Health-care Reform read or download pdf Forecasting Imaging Use Under Health-care Reform read or download pdf Hospital-based Versus Freestanding Outpatient Imaging Services read or download pdf Cost Comparison: Hospital-based Versus Freestanding Outpatient Imaging Services
read or download pdf Outpatient Imaging Utilization Trends read or download pdf The Radiology Staffing Market, Temporary and Permanent read or download pdf CT and MRI: Regional Variations in Utilization and Reimbursement read or download pdf